Technical library
Rectification
Turning a defect register into a scope, and closing items out with evidence.
Rectification articles
How do you manage passive fire defects in an occupied building?
Build the programme around the building's operation as well as the technical repair. Group the work by location and access, identify shutdowns and permits early, protect occupied areas, and keep open defects visible until they are closed out.
Scott CunninghamHow do you turn a passive fire defect register into a rectification scope?
Preserve the client's original asset IDs and wording, then group the items by system, observable condition, likely repair pathway, access and evidence quality. A register becomes a workable scope at the point where the repeatable repairs separate from the exceptions.
Scott CunninghamWhat evidence is useful for closing a passive fire defect?
Evidence closes a defect when it connects the original finding to the completed work and to the technical basis relied on. In practice that means the defect reference and its location, photographs before and after, the system used and the evidence behind it, who carried out the repair and when, and any variation from the original method. The exact set varies by system and by contract.
Scott CunninghamWhen can passive fire defects be grouped as repeatable conditions?
Group them only where the assets, the construction and the supported repair condition are genuinely the same. Similar-looking photographs are not enough.
Scott Cunningham
Still not sure what you are looking at?
Send the tag, the schedule reference and photographs of the actual condition. We will tell you what they show and what else is needed.