Fire Rated Systems

Across every service · Conflicting evidence

What should you do when drawings, schedules and site conditions disagree?

Short answer

Do not quietly choose the document that makes the work easiest. Record the conflict, identify which document creates the project requirement, and send the actual site condition into the agreed resolution process before anything is installed.

What changes the answer

  • Which document creates the requirement. A fire engineering report, a specification, a drawing note and a schedule do not carry equal weight, and the one that governs is rarely the one nearest to hand.
  • Whether the disagreement is about what is required, or about what is actually there. Those are two different problems and mixing them wastes a week.
  • Whether any document is superseded, and whether everyone on the job is working from the same revision.
  • Whether the work is already installed, because that changes it from a question into a variation.
  • Whether the conflict repeats across the job, which usually means it is a documentation fault rather than a site one.
  • Who on the project is actually entitled to resolve it. A verbal answer from someone who cannot give one is worse than no answer.

What to check on site

  • The revision and date on every document you are holding, and whether a later one exists that you have not been sent.
  • The fire engineering report, which usually outranks a drawing note and is the document most often left out of the conversation.
  • The condition on site, photographed, with dimensions rather than adjectives.
  • Whether the schedule and the drawing are describing the same element, or two different elements that have been confused.
  • What was installed either side of it. A pattern tells you which document the job has in practice been following.

What to do next

Send the conflicting documents with their revisions, and a photograph of the condition on site. We will tell you which one creates the requirement, what the difference actually costs, and put the answer in writing — so it exists somewhere other than in a conversation nobody can produce later.

General information only. A conclusion about a specific condition requires the actual construction, the evidence behind it and the site condition to be reviewed.